User talk:Gelthor/Highscores: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of User:Gelthor/Highscores
WhiteGandalf (talk | contribs) (proposal of cheat designation) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Annotated High Scores as cheats == | |||
We should annotate that a bunch of highscores are blatant cheats. | We should annotate that a bunch of highscores are blatant cheats. | ||
Hard coding for test sequences has nothing to do with functionality. | Hard coding for test sequences has nothing to do with functionality. | ||
For those players who do not actually fancy cheating but rather practically useful competition, the highscores should be differentiated between cheats (which only satisfy the specific test sequence) and actual functioning units. It is already vaguely hinted in the description and supported by jokes ingame, but a clarification would suite the rather honest scientific background of the game. | For those players who do not actually fancy cheating but rather practically useful competition, the highscores should be differentiated between cheats (which only satisfy the specific test sequence) and actual functioning units. It is already vaguely hinted in the description and supported by jokes ingame, but a clarification would suite the rather honest scientific background of the game. [[User:WhiteGandalf|WhiteGandalf]] ([[User talk:WhiteGandalf|talk]]) 07:53, 31 May 2024 | ||
: [[User:WhiteGandalf|WhiteGandalf]], please remember to sign your comments on all talk pages with <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>, and to create topic headings to reduce future confusion. | |||
: Back to your actual statement: Can you be more specific in which scores of this specific lists are cheats in your opinion? This list is specifically curated to not include such stuff, except where mentioned in the spoilered comment. [[User:MegaIng|MegaIng]] ([[User talk:MegaIng|talk]]) 15:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:20, 31 May 2024
Annotated High Scores as cheats[edit source]
We should annotate that a bunch of highscores are blatant cheats. Hard coding for test sequences has nothing to do with functionality. For those players who do not actually fancy cheating but rather practically useful competition, the highscores should be differentiated between cheats (which only satisfy the specific test sequence) and actual functioning units. It is already vaguely hinted in the description and supported by jokes ingame, but a clarification would suite the rather honest scientific background of the game. WhiteGandalf (talk) 07:53, 31 May 2024
- WhiteGandalf, please remember to sign your comments on all talk pages with
~~~~, and to create topic headings to reduce future confusion. - Back to your actual statement: Can you be more specific in which scores of this specific lists are cheats in your opinion? This list is specifically curated to not include such stuff, except where mentioned in the spoilered comment. MegaIng (talk) 15:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)